Towards a Unified Physics Theory - "The Theory of Everything"

Theories of Everything, Mapped

by Natalie Wolchover Quanta Magazine

(scroll down)

Posted 2016-04-21

(*Harvard professors included)

2016-4-20

At a packed Sanders Theatre, Stephen Hawking tackled the contradictory qualities of black holes hvrd.me/4mTz9c

Notes from link:

**Black hole nature/information determined by amount of mass, amount of rotation and electric charge of stars that formed it**

**Now working on “supertranslations” to explain the mechanism of information encoding on the hole’s event horizon**

2016-01-09

Andrew Strominger discusses his new black-hole paper co-authored by Stephen Hawking and Malcolm Perry bit.ly/22QbQ00 @seth_fletcher

Notes:

**What falls in a black hole is recorded on its surface: “quantum pixels” on an information-storing “holographic plate”.**

**Particle falls in black hole (particles carry mass and are coupled to gravity) : graviton added on the horizon of the black hole.**

**Charged particle falls in black hole : photon added on the horizon of the black hole.**

Excerpts:

"The horizon of a black hole has the weird feature that it’s a sphere and it’s expanding outward at the speed of light. For every point on the sphere, there’s a light ray. So it’s composed of light rays. But it doesn’t get any bigger and that’s because of the force of gravity and the curvature of space. And, by the way, that’s why nothing that is inside a black hole can get out—because the boundary of the black hole itself is already moving at the speed of light."

"Now the horizon of a black hole is a three-dimensional surface. There are the two angular directions around a sphere. And then there is the timelike direction, which is actually lightlike because the horizon is moving at the speed of light. And that lightlike direction has a boundary. If you go to the end of those light rays there’s a boundary. And that boundary is where the hologram lives. So the soft photons or gravitons—when you add them to the black hole—they can be thought of as living at that boundary."

A tweet

Space defined by interactions between objects ("quantum graphity") or structure of cause &effect (causal set theory)

Quote:

Einstein called nonlocality “spooky action at a distance”. He was wrong. It’s weirder. We review @gmusser’s latest ow.ly/4mRbrC

Posted 2014-04-14/15

Excerpts from this Scientific American talk (+transcript).

@SteveMirsky interview on @gmusser book "The Complete Idiot's Guide to String Theory"

(Both are Scientific American contributors).

Contributors @sciam talk (+transcript) on #StringTheory @SteveMirsky on book of @gmusser scientificamerican.com/podcast/episod… pic.twitter.com/7nfGVe3DBD

(infobook.com) String theory: Keep zooming in on matter and you get to strings, structures which can vibrate in different ways to give you all different particles

George: "as you keep zoom in and you see quarks and then you keep on zooming, (...) those quarks according to string theory are actually tiny, tiny, tiny little strings that are vibrating and moving around. The beauty of the theory is that one type of thing—namely a string—can vibrate in different ways and give you different types of particles. It can give you an up-quark, down-quark, and electron, photon, the whole zoo of particles that have been discovered.”

Steve: What does that give you other than a felicitous kind of aesthetic feeling about the universe, that it's all connected together in some kind of unified whole?

Contributors @sciam talk-transcript #StringTheory | @SteveMirsky interview on @gmusser book scientificamerican.com/podcast/episod… pic.twitter.com/cWKgGsiyZs

**(infobook.vom) What do we mean by “other dimensions”? And what it the link with the “string theory”**

George: For instance, the forces that may have caused the universe to expand very early in the history of our universe—they seemed to require a force that lacks direction; it has no directionality to it. It's called a scalar field in the jargon and that's precisely the kind of thing you might get from an extra dimension. You would get a directionless type of force acting on you. Such type of things string theory might give you. I should point out that there are other explanations for scalar fields as well, but string theory does seem to give those naturally to you.

Steve: Well, so let's review: just basically string theory says that there are many dimensions that we're not aware of in our three-dimensional world of perception and that all the fundamental particles are actually tiny little strings that are vibrating in different ways from each other.

**Branes as in "Membranes"**

Excerpt from this Scientific American article by Harvard Physics @harvardphysics Professor Subir Sachdev

"In the mid-1990s string theorists such as Joseph Polchinski of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, realized that their theory predicts more than strings. It also implies the existence of “branes”: surfaces to which strings stick like bugs on flypaper. These membranes represent a vast kingdom of physics, beyond the high-energy particles the theory originally addressed.

What looks like a particle—a mere point—to us might actually be the end point of a string stretching from a brane through a higher spatial dimension. We can view the universe either as made up of point particles moving in a four-dimensional spacetime with a complex set of interparticle interactions or as made up of strings moving in a five-dimensional spacetime attached to branes."

When a condensed matter physicist searches for string theory papers

**Electrons buddies in “superconductor phase” and the “strange metal phase":**

**“The differences among these phases arise from the collective behavior of electrons.”**

Notes on this Scientific American article by Harvard Physics Professor Subir Sachdev

*(very interesting image legends)*

**On the phases of matter**

According to wikipedia “in the physical sciences, a phase is a region of space (a thermodynamic system), throughout which all physical properties of a material are essentially uniform.”

“The term phase is sometimes used as a synonym for state of matter”

Until recently we considered the following classical phases: plasma, gas, liquid and solid.

The difference between the phases comes from features of the collective behavior of the atoms and specifically their arrangement which is linked to their motion (described by Newtonian mechanics) which is linked to their temperature.

As mentioned by the author “Yet these three phases do not begin to exhaust the possibilities. A solid is not just an array of atoms but also a swarm of electrons.”

The notion of Quantum phases has been introduced.

What happens if you provide energy e.g. by applying a voltage, by providing an electric current? The swarm of electrons can have different behaviors: move with difficulty if not at all e.g Teflon which is called an insulator, move with ease or low resistance e.g. metal like copper which is called a conductor or move with almost no resistance at all as is in the case of superconductors.

“Over the past two decades physicists have discovered additional phases of electrons in solids. A particularly interesting example does not even have a proper name: physicists have defaulted into calling it the strange metal. It betrays itself by the unusual way its electrical resistance depends on temperature.”

The main idea needed to explain these behavior is entanglement described by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen.

“Close to the quantum-critical point, the electrons no longer behave independently or even in pairs but become entangled en masse. The same reasoning that EPR applied to two electrons now applies
to all 10^{23 }of
them. Neighboring electrons are entangled with each other; this pair, in turn, is entangled with neighboring pairs, and so on, creating an enormous network of interconnections.”

Posted 2014-04-12 with the exception of the Big Bang and black hole simulation part that was added on 2014-04-13

How does space look like?

Like a lattice similar to shirt under microscope with threads arriving at circular surfaces

Like a polymer lattice.

General Relativity at 100: Where do space and time come from? http://ow.ly/V23CK

Excerpt from the New York Times article:

**SCIENTIST AT WORK: Abhay Ashtekar; Taste-Testing a Recipe for the Cosmos**

"On incredibly tiny scales -- 10-33 centimeters, or smaller than a trillionth of a trillionth of the diameter of an atom -- space-time becomes jagged and discontinuous. At those scales, Dr.
Ashtekar said, space dissolves into a sort of polymer network, ''like your shirt,'' which looks continuous from a distance but is actually made of one-dimensional threads."

The equations that resulted were later shown to predict the polymers by Dr. Ashtekar, Dr. Carlo Rovelli of the Center for Theoretical Physics at the University of Marseilles in France and Dr.
Lee Smolin of Pennsylvania State University.

(...)

His first step was to express Einstein's equations in terms of variables with a chirality, or ''handedness,'' in which a circle drawn in the clockwise sense would look different from one drawn in the opposite sense. Against all intuition, Einstein's equations, which show no preference for direction, broke into simpler pieces in the Ashtekar variables.

''At one level, it was simply a redefinition of variables, which one might think was a fairly minor thing to do. But it really rejuvenated the whole field and caused quite an explosion of activity,'' Dr. Isham said.

Soon there followed the solutions showing the polymerlike structure of space.

(...) So to figure out the area inside a circle in this weird space, one would count up the strands that puncture its surface and multiply by the quantum of area carried by each of them. In this way, area is not smooth but comes in bundles.

(Image by Nature)

The same rule holds for the area of a black hole's event horizon, the place beyond which anything is drawn into the black hole. Last year (1998) Dr. Ashtekar, et al showed that the polymers running into a black hole in a sense hold it ''still'' at the puncture points, like a water balloon supported on blunt pins. The rest of the horizon is free to jiggle about quantum mechanically.

Like the bouncing and jiggling of atoms in an ordinary gas, such motion has a definite entropy (or randomness) and therefore a temperature.

(End of excerpts)

"If I take this shirt, and I take a magnifying glass, I can see that the shirt is fundamentally one-dimensional, because the threads are one-dimensional. It’s just that those threads are so
densely packed that I get an illusion that it’s two-dimensional. What comes out in loop quantum gravity is that the geometry of space is like that. It’s woven by these one-dimensional fibres, it’s
like a polymer. But this polymer is so intricately woven and tightly spaced that we get this illusion of continuum. It’s coarse-graining."

(by Nature News article, above)

What happens if you run a Bing Bang simulation/ a cosmos simulation backwards or a black hole simulation back from its horizon? Will you get the Bang or the singularity?

Answer: You will get a Bounce and a tunnel to another cosmos, to another part of space.

#BigBang & #BlackHole simulation backwards:Bang & singularity?Bounce & another space tunnel ow.ly/V23CK pic.twitter.com/XtnZTteBc5

Excellent article by Nature journal with milestones towards a #UnifiedPhysicsTheory. On the constituents or "atoms" of the Space-Time Fabric.

"a macroscopic average over the motions of myriad atoms and molecules"

"a macroscopic approximation to the unseen constituents of space and time"

Notes on article by Zeeya Merali published in the journal Nature.

Excellent article with milestones towards a #UnifiedPhysicsTheory. The constituents,"atoms" of the Space-Time Fabric

Quoting:

General Relativity at 100: Where do space and time come from? http://ow.ly/V23CK

1) #Bekenstein @HebrewU #Blackhole has entropy.Proport. to horizon surface (vs atom number/volume).3D>2D.Holography pic.twitter.com/sm6kMrvaux

2) #Hawking #DAMPT @Cambridge_Uni #Blackhole emits Hawking radiation. [Black body emits radiation].Astronaut run in empty space as heat bath

#Physics taking place in #DAMTP Tearoom can be represented by a theory defined on its walls damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/pu… pic.twitter.com/DhqPeyieG7

Assertions of the #holographic principle and the #DAMPT Tearoom @Cambridge_Uni damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/pu… pic.twitter.com/jOtOUi1Dnf

3) #TJacobson @UofMaryland Space point sits on “black-hole horizon”:entropy-surface area.Thermodyn equations yield Einstein’s relativity equ

4) #TJacobson @UofMaryland Average of motion of myriads of atoms & Average of unseen constituents of space and time pic.twitter.com/4rZRbwWgEi

5) @erikverlinde @UvA_Amsterdam Statistical #thermodynamics of #spacetime constituents generate Newton's law of #gravitational attraction

When entropy increase is reflected on increase of surface. A holographic
paradigm.

What happens when a black hole devours matter?

Stuff is homogenized, reduced to particles.

More particles in a ballon? Increase of volume? Increase of entropy?

Scientistist tells us increase of the surface of its horizon. Increase of entropy proportional to the increase of its horizon surface.

What is inside, in a 3D space, in a volume is represented on a 2D surface?

That is similar to 3D object represented on 2D holographic film. Holography

What is this 2D surface? It is space-time.

What are the elementary components of space-time?

Let us take points with some properties.

That will be points similar to “black hole horizons” whose area increases with increase of entropy. If you solve the math with thermodynamics you get Einstein equations on relativity and gravity.

Conclusion:

a macroscopic average over the motions of myriad atoms and molecules -> statistical laws of thermodynamics ->

a macroscopic approximation to the unseen constituents of space and time -> statistical laws of gravity

(a-tom cf tomography, the un-cuttable, the indivisible, the individual)

The Stefan–Boltzmann law tells us that a black body emits radiation which is only dependent on its temperature.

(For instance, the temperature of the human body would correspond to emission of infrared radiation which is understood as heat.)

Stephen Hawkings tells us that something similar applies to black holes. They send out radiation and this black-body type radiation has been termed Hawking radiation.

Let us introduce in the discussion the notion of entropy. Let us consider a rotting vegetable or fruit. The highly-organized biological structure is broken down, is homogenized to an amorphic mass which corresponds to poorly organized structure. Molecules that were highly organized are now loose and disordered. We say that the entropy of the system is increasing.

It has been proven that black holes have entropy.

A black hole due to its intense gravitational force attracts everything in its vicinity. Nothing can escape, not even light.

What happens to the stuff it devours?

What would we anticipate for an increase of molecule, atom, in general particle number? An increase of volume.

Scientists tell us that, that what increases is the surface area of its event horizon, the boundary out of which nothing can escape. The increase of the entropy of the black hole is proportional to the increase of the surface of its event horizon.

Is it a case of what is inside, in a volume or 3D, being represented on a surface, on 2D?

That is similar to 3D object represented on 2D holographic film.

What a black hole eats (inferred to correspond to 3D volume) increases its surface horizon (2D)?

Let us try to approach the question: If space-time is a fabric which are its elementary components?

Let us consider points. What are the properties associated with this points?

Ted Johnson in 1995 considers points similar to “black hole horizons” whose area increases with increase of entropy. The math with thermodynamics yields Einstein equations on relativity.

Conclusion:

a macroscopic average over the motions of myriad atoms and molecules -> statistical laws of thermodynamics ->

a macroscopic approximation to the unseen constituents of space and time à statistical laws of gravity